Observe with purpose
Each model evaluates market conditions through a distinct, rules-based approach.
SURGICAL PRECISION / COPY TRADING
In development · Forward evaluation continues. Subscriber access is not yet open.
Algorithmic precision.AI relentlessness & thoroughness.Human judgment & imagination.
Advanced AI supports code development, execution-log analysis and strategy refinement. Automated execution is the normal mode. Human judgment sets the strategy and supervises risk, with exceptional intervention intended to help the system return to trading in line with market conditions.
THE HUMAN + ALGORITHM APPROACH
AI helps develop and evaluate the system. Bots execute the rules. The operator sets the strategy, with manual intervention reserved for exceptional situations.
The strategy is designed to run through automated entries and exits under human oversight. Manual intervention is an exception, used with the aim of resolving a disrupted trading cycle so the bots can resume responding to the market through their programmed signals.
Meet the approachEach model evaluates market conditions through a distinct, rules-based approach.
Independent strategies apply their own programmed entry and exit decisions.
Detailed records support analysis of results, costs and execution quality.
Research explores improvements and new ideas before proposed live changes.
A STRATEGY WITH OVERSIGHT
Dedicated infrastructure supports the core suite, while human oversight guides the research agenda and approves live changes.
Each core model manages its own trades within a shared, supervised framework.
Exit rules and protection differ by model and destination. Research reviews those differences alongside strategy exposure, contract values and account-level safeguards.
Scheduled health checks and detailed records help the operator follow system activity and investigate execution.
Real-tick backtests, separate validation periods, demo observation and execution-log review test ideas before proposed changes reach live operation.
ENGINEERED THROUGH EXPERIENCE
A supervised trading system developed with advanced AI tools and shaped by a vascular surgeon and hands-on scalper.
Surgery demands close observation, precise timing, repeatable technique and an immediate response when conditions change. SPCT brings that operating discipline to short-duration gold and Nasdaq trading: bots handle normal execution while human oversight sets strategic direction. Exceptional manual intervention aims to help the system return to trading in line with the market.
AI is used as an engineering and analysis tool. It supports code development, reconciles detailed execution logs, examines fills and costs, compares new results with earlier evidence and proposes refinements for operator approval.
The account record is published with realised results, trading costs and available open profit or loss visible together. The purpose is to make both the performance and the development process inspectable.
Meet the founderComplementary models examine short-term market movement. Execution quality and trading costs are central to evaluating the approach.
Dedicated logging links execution details and costs to volatility at entry and exit, trade duration and sampled drawdown. AI-assisted review examines complete trading cycles, including automatic recovery and manual intervention.
Submitted trading records are reviewed for net results, exposure and recovery behavior. Separate hedge counts distinguish observed outcomes from gaps in monitoring. Proposed changes require operator approval and further evaluation.
Algorithmic consistency for routine execution. AI-assisted scrutiny of code and results. Human judgment for strategy, exceptions and the next iteration.
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT / 8 OCTOBER 2026
SPCT now studies a broader family of gold and Nasdaq strategies. Development connects market observation, real-tick testing, separate validation periods and execution review, with human approval guiding the next iteration.
THE BOT FAMILIES
Each model has its own entry logic and trade ownership. Inclusion in the suite describes the engineering scope; it is not a claim that a model will perform in every market condition.
Gold / XAUUSD
Studies a return through a previously identified price level. Research examines how levels are refreshed, how signals expire and which market conditions justify an entry.
Gold / XAUUSD
Studies a break of structure followed by a retest. Current work separates the effect of entry filters from the effect of target and stop placement.
Gold / XAUUSD
Studies directional momentum and the conditions that sustain or invalidate it. Entry qualification, volatility and exit behaviour are reviewed together.
Gold / XAUUSD
Studies price interaction with a volume-weighted reference. Research reviews session context, pullback behaviour and the effect of permitted trading hours.
Gold / XAUUSD
Combines momentum context across several timeframes with a pullback before entry. Alert expiry, repeat-entry spacing and sizing are explicit parts of the evaluation.
Nasdaq / US100
Extends the level-reclaim approach to Nasdaq price action. Instrument-specific contract values, price increments and sizing are checked independently from gold.
Nasdaq / US100
Examines break-and-retest behaviour on Nasdaq. Testing treats the index as a separate market rather than assuming that gold settings transfer unchanged.
Nasdaq / US100
Studies Nasdaq momentum within its own execution and volatility context. Source signals and copied micro-futures positions are reviewed as separate stages.
EXPERIMENTAL / DEMO EVALUATION
A separate trend-and-pullback research candidate explores trend timeframe, moving-average context, pullback requirements and volatility filters. Parameter studies are followed by individual validation runs and forward demo observation. It remains distinct from the eight-model suite.
Earlier work on Body Efficiency, Bounce and Momentum Basis remains part of the development history. Earlier experiments are not presented as additional active models.
HOW WE WORK TOWARD IMPROVEMENT
Each investigation begins with a specific question: an entry filter, an exit rule, a trading window or an execution problem. The existing version provides a baseline, so a change can be traced to its intended purpose.
Historical testing uses real tick data where available and records the exact bot version and inputs. We inspect data coverage, broker timing and contract specifications before interpreting a run.
Parameter searches use an earlier period for development and a separate later period for forward validation. We compare neighbouring settings and examine drawdown and recovery behaviour, rather than selecting one attractive backtest in isolation.
Research candidates can remain in a dedicated demo environment while new observations accumulate. TrendVol follows this path, with a demo-only guard. Historical testing does not by itself qualify a candidate for live use.
Strategy events, source orders and destination fills are reconciled. Review covers spread, fees, latency, slippage, rejected actions and manual exits. Tick capture around trades helps reconstruct the sequence where recordings are available; gaps remain identified as gaps.
Proposed changes are reviewed by the operator, backed up and recorded before rollout. Software regression checks and monitored operation help identify unintended effects. Subsequent observations feed the next research question.
CURRENT LINES OF INVESTIGATION
Gold Retest research compares target-and-stop combinations separately from entry requirements such as candle structure, volatility, retest tolerance and signal age. Keeping these questions distinct helps reveal which mechanism is responsible for a change.
Historical studies across the copied bot suite examine when signals occur and how session filters affect participation. Trigger logs distinguish a quiet period with no qualifying signal from a signal blocked by a rule, a disconnected source or an execution failure.
The copying framework now handles gold and Nasdaq through separate instrument lanes within one copier per platform. Research and regression checks cover contract values, shared account exposure, daily safeguards and source-to-destination reconciliation.
Execution work examines stale quotes, interrupted connections and manual position closures. The aim is to preserve a clear record of what happened, prevent duplicate or historical entries, and resume only under the configured conditions.
AI supports code review, test construction, log analysis and comparison of research variants. The operator sets the questions and approves deployment. Research findings do not automatically rewrite live trading rules.
This update describes the research process, not performance results or promised improvements. Historical tests, demo observation and live execution records answer different questions; none guarantees future returns. Subscriber access remains in development.
Latest recorded results
24 September, 17:00 → 25 September 2026, 17:39 · Greek / broker time (UTC+3)
The latest MT5 record brings together short-term cycles, momentum and price-level strategies. Reclaim closed seven trades with seven wins and €23.92 net profit. Body 13/17 also made its first entry following its signal-engine update.
Booked net profit
€149.36
All strategies and manual basket management; after recorded costs.
Closed cycles & trades
119
102 won · 17 lost. Short-term recovery legs grouped into cycles.
Reclaim 4/9
7 / 7 wins
€23.92 net across seven closed trades in this window.
Open at cutoff
1
Body 13/17 · account floating P&L -€3.99.
Balance calculated from a €100 starting amount plus recorded net trading profit. Excludes open P&L and cash transfers; this is a rebased view, not the broker balance.
| Strategy | Closed | Won | Lost | Net P&L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15-second originalcycles | 40 | 40 | 0 | €41.48 |
| 15-second reversecycles | 40 | 39 | 1 | €40.52 |
| Momentum 20/15trades | 7 | 4 | 3 | €35.37 |
| Reclaim 4/9trades | 7 | 7 | 0 | €23.92 |
| Retest 13/20trades | 4 | 3 | 1 | €16.12 |
| Bounce 5/5trades | 15 | 7 | 8 | -€5.77 |
| VWAP 15/8trades | 6 | 2 | 4 | -€2.25 |
| Body 13/17trades · 1 open | 0 | 0 | 0 | €0.00 |
| Closed total | 119 | 102 | 17 | €149.39 |
The 15-second rows include automatic recovery and two matched manual basket exits. Hedge legs are counted within their cycle. The open Body trade’s -€0.03 entry cost is included in booked profit, outside the closed total. EMA and Ranger had no recorded entries in this window.
Results now cover the latest submitted log through 25 September at 17:39. The €100 chart provides a consistent starting reference, with the calculated balance and percentage profit shown alongside it.
At the final account reading, broker balance was €250.84 and equity was €246.85. Closed results and floating P&L remain separate.
Historical snapshot, including manual management. Seven Reclaim wins are an early observation, not a forecast. Settings changed during this period; this is not a single-settings validation.
SIMPLE, PROPOSED PRICING
Our intended model makes room for smaller accounts, with a profit-linked fee for larger ones. Final terms will be confirmed before subscriber access opens.
PROPOSED STARTING ALLOCATION
€100Or the equivalent in USD.
Proposed minimum starting allocation.ACCOUNTS UP TO €1,000
0%Proposed performance fee.
No SPCT performance fee up to and including €1,000. Broker charges still apply.ACCOUNTS ABOVE €1,000
1%Proposed fee on net new profits.
After costs and recovery of earlier losses. Billing and valuation terms to be agreed.Not yet. The source-account strategy is being evaluated. Subscriber account connection and copy execution are not available on this website. Contact us to express interest in a future launch.
The proposed service would operate through your own account with a participating broker. This website does not take deposits. Supported brokers, eligibility and connection arrangements will be announced before launch.
No. An opposite hedge changes exposure; it does not erase a loss. A basket can remain negative, and losses can increase. Break-even and profit targets are objectives, not guarantees. The current system has no hard monetary loss cap.
Not exactly. Account size, execution timing, spreads, commissions and slippage can change copied results. The published source-account history includes manual intervention and is not a record of subscriber returns.
The core models follow their programmed entry and exit rules. Scheduled research examines how results vary with conditions, and the operator reviews proposed changes before live deployment.
FOLLOW THE NEXT CHAPTER
Interested in a future copy-trading launch? Tell us a little about yourself and the broker you use.
contact@spct.proNo deposit or account connection required.FOR BROKERS & PLATFORM PARTNERS
We welcome conversations about execution, transparent reporting and a measured route to subscriber access.
Leveraged trading involves substantial risk of loss. Past performance does not predict future returns. Hedging changes exposure and can increase gross exposure and margin requirements; it does not erase losses or guarantee recovery. The current system has no hard monetary loss cap. Automated exits require a connected, running terminal with trading enabled, and break-even or profit targets may never be reached.
Manual intervention is intended as an exception to normal automated operation, not a guarantee of recovery or a claim that intervention has been rare in the published history. The current core suite comprises six independent strategies with programmed exits. Legacy basket management is separate from those strategies. Historical records include earlier configurations; the current deployment remains under forward evaluation. This website does not accept deposits, connect subscriber accounts or execute trades. No broker partnership is announced or implied. Proposed pricing, account eligibility, broker arrangements and applicable requirements must be confirmed before launch. The proposed €100 subscriber allocation is not a limit on losses. Subscribers would bear their own gains and losses; the operator trading personal capital does not guarantee subscriber outcomes.
AI-assisted development, surgical experience and close supervision do not establish a profitable trading edge. Scheduled reviews use available execution records and market data, with operator approval required before proposed bot changes are implemented.
The latest imported MT5 log covers 24 September 2026 at 17:00 through 25 September at 17:39:25, broker time (UTC+3, matching Greek time). This is a historical snapshot, not a live feed. Repeated deal records are deduplicated by broker ticket. Net results include recorded commissions, swaps and fees, and all manual trades in the selected window.
The 15-second models are counted as cycles, from initial entry until their positions close. Automatic recovery legs and the two manual hedges matched by overlapping exposure and simultaneous basket exits are included in the corresponding cycle, rather than counted as separate wins or losses. Other models are counted by closed trade. The Body position remained open at cutoff: its entry cost is included in booked profit, while its floating result remains separate.
The default chart begins at a reference €100 and adds booked net trading profit, excluding deposits, withdrawals and floating P&L. The resulting balance and percentage are calculated on this reference base; they are not the broker account balance or a deposit-adjusted account return. The alternative chart shows actual sampled broker balance and equity.
Account observations begin on 24 September at 18:03. Sampled peak-to-trough equity drawdown in the available heartbeat readings was €52.63; worst sampled floating P&L was -€59.67. Monitoring is incomplete before the first observation, and periodic readings can miss intraperiod extremes.
This window includes changing settings and manual basket management. It is not a test of one fixed configuration or the account’s lifetime record. Reclaim’s seven wins are a small historical sample. Research into entry filters is exploratory and has not established a reliable improvement. The external Myfxbook link is supplementary; the latest figures on this page are calculated from the submitted MT5 log.
Results are from the source account, not subscriber accounts. Copied outcomes may differ because of account size, timing, spreads, commissions and slippage.